Does author behavior influence your buying habits?

www.123rf.com

There's been new chatter in the Twitter-verse about authors behaving badly (although really, does it ever stop?).  By now, you know the basics: someone responded badly to a review/blog post/Tweet written about their book, and given the public nature of the internet, their meltdown quickly went viral.  It's not pretty, but like a train wreck, we (in the collective sense) can't look away.

My question to you is this, dear readers.  When you see or hear about these author meltdowns, does it influence your buying behavior?  I ask because one school of thought tells us that no publicity is bad--even if people are talking about you for the wrong reasons, it still gets your name out there.  Perhaps this is another example of infamy being better than obscurity.

Personally, I think meltdowns by new authors can be the kiss of death. You (in the general sense) have not yet developed a forgiving fan base, and why would you want your name associated with any kind of negativity?  Maybe I'm wrong, but I think those authors who have written a gajillion NYT bestsellers have a sufficiently large fan base that even when said author is being obnoxious, enough of their fans won't see it that way, and will continue to buy their books.  Of course, you don't write a gajillion NYT bestsellers unless you're a professional, and professionals tend to conduct themselves as such.

What are your thoughts?

Hmmm....

So I was checking out Etsy the other day, and I ran across a site that makes and sells book purses.  Have you guys seen these?  You take a hardcover book and re-purpose it as a handbag.

www.123rf.com

My first reaction was delight.  I love books, I love purses--the perfect marriage, yes?  But then I got to thinking about it. How are those purses made?  Oh, that's right.  The books are destroyed.  Their pages cut out and discarded (or recycled), leaving the shell behind.

Now, a book is more than it's physical presence.  The story lives beyond the printed word, and no amount of physical manipulation will truly destroy the book.  It's just...  It's a book.  Something that is, dare I say, almost sacred to me?  Destroying a book like that feels awfully close to book burning, even though my rational mind knows they're nothing alike.

On the other hand, a book purse is an unusual thing.  I'm sure it would inspire a lot of comments.  Is that such a bad thing?  Maybe someone sees your book purse and is intrigued.  Why did you pick that book? What is it about that story that made you want to carry the book around all the time, advertising your literary taste?  Maybe they get inspired to pick up the book and get lost in the story.  Maybe you bring another reader into the fold....

I still haven't decided what I think about these bags.  Unusual? Undoubtedly.  A good thing?  I just don't know.

What do you think?  Am I being irrational?  Would you buy a book purse (or do you have one already)?

Are we too nice?

www.123rf.com

There's a very interesting piece on Slate regarding the current literary culture.  Have you read it yet?

I think the author makes some good points--given the ubiquitous nature of social networking, authors are increasingly interacting with readers and each other.  This is not always a bad thing--I know that as a reader, I have enjoyed talking with authors about my favorite books, and as a writer, I really appreciate hearing them talk about their process and strategy.

However.

I have noticed on some author websites that any opinions or reviews that are less than glowing praise are shouted down by other fans.  There are countless accounts of authors behaving badly on GoodReads, Amazon, or other review websites.  As the author of this piece notes, this culture of love makes it difficult for critical reviews to come to light, because it's very easy to conflate the work under review with the person who just tweeted the adorable picture of her puppy.

Should authors step back from social media, in order to keep themselves separate from their work?  I don't think so.  Nowadays, publishers practically demand that authors perform some type of self-promotion, be it a Facebook page, Twitter account, blog, or other type of social media.  This is even more true for self-published authors, who must promote themselves loudly and often to have a chance of being heard in this crowded market.

I think it's important to differentiate the one-star drive-by reviews (the ones where the writer clearly hasn't read the book) from those that articulate an opinion and provide examples to back it up.  The latter are the type of reviews that are most helpful, both to authors and readers, and we as a literary community should encourage them.  Personally, when I review a book I try to provide examples from the text that support my argument as to whether it's a good book or not.

This is an interesting issue, to be sure, and I'm wondering what you all think about it.  Are we too friendly?  Do we stifle critical opinion because we don't want to hurt the author's feelings?  Or do we have the right balance of criticism and praise?  Let me know your thoughts!